Life and Culture in North Korea, Friend and North Korean Comedy Film

On October 9, 2020, the GW Institute of Korean Studies hosted a book talk with Korea Foundation and Kim-Renaud Associate Professor of Korean Literature and Culture Studies, Dr. Immanuel Kim, who was joined by Dong Hoon Kim, Associate Professor, Department of Cinema Studies at the University of Oregon to discuss two of his recently published books reflecting on the cultural influences of North Korean Comedy Films on the North Korean people and the wider world audience.

To begin, Dr. Immanuel Kim provided an introduction detailing the rise of North Korean art through the use of comedy films and literature which become a preliminary exposure to North Korean life and culture to those outside the DPRK. His first book, “Friends,” is an english translation of a novel written in 1988 by North Korean author Paek Namnyoung that went on to be republished in South Korea four years later before gaining its first international release in a number of western languages starting with French since 2011. “Friends” grew to popularity not just in North Korea but eventually outside the northern part of the peninsula by embodying characteristics that go against perceptions of the North Korean culture.

The novel itself steps away from traditional themes found within North Korean literature and film, such as representing the party and elements of strong nationalism and instead walks the reader through the life and challenges of a strong female lead living in North Korea. The breakout of “Friends” embodied many of the diversity in trends to come out of the 70’s and 80’s in North Korea storytelling, which goes beyond the political ideology to focus more on reflecting the lifestyle of North Korea through a comedic lens while also parodying popular tropes that came out of the west in Hollywood.

Such diversity would be heavily explored in Dr. Kim’s second book, “Laughing North Koreans: The Culture of Comedy Films,” where he also reflects on how these films hold such a cultural influence on the North Korean people not just through storytelling but the actors themselves. Many of the standout actors working in these films become popularize representations of people that many North Koreans want to replicate themselves, much like in the west. From the haircuts to their mannerisms and comedic moments, these actors portray what North Koreans are from all walks of life, but as Dr. Immanuel Kim would note later in the session, these actors are also individualized and very open about their careers within North Korean film culture, not just another piece in the propaganda machine.

In taking away these attribute Dr. Immanuel Kim, encourages the audience to not ignore the political ideologies that remain present in these films but challenges them to look at these films through different perspectives and layers to better understand how the culture surrounding these works of art have shaped North Korean culture as a whole and provide a new insight for outsiders of what North Korean life looks like.

The 2nd North Korea Economic Forum Annual Conference (Part I) “Current Development Trends in North Korea”

On October 5, 2020, the GW Institute for Korea (GWIKS) and the KDI School of Public Policy and Management (KDIS) co-hosted the 2nd North Korea Economic Forum Annual Conference (Part I) “Current Development Trends in North Korea”. The event was joined by experts from academia, international development, and tourism including Jerome Sauvage, Former United Nations Coordinator in North Korea; Matt Kulesza, Senior North Korean Tour Guide and Media Liasion of Young Pioneer Tous; Yonho Kim, Associate Director of GWIKS; Joongho Kim, Non-Resident Scholar of GWIKS; and Randall Spadoni, North Korea Program Director of World Vision.

Moderated by Jisoo M. Kim, Director of the GW Institute for Korea, three honorary speakers: Ilana Feldman, the Interim Dean of GW Elliott School of International Affairs, Jong-Il You, the Dean of KDIS, and Daniel Wertz, the Chair of the North Korea Economic Forum, opened the forum with congratulatory remarks. Then, Celeste Arrington, the Korea Foundation Associate Professor of Political Science and International Affair at GW, led the main panel discussion by introducing Mr. Sauvage and his presentation on North Korea’s public infrastructure. From health facilities, energy security, to water and sanitation, Mr. Sauvage spoke in detail about how each category was failing to meet its needs due to poor governance. Despite the opportunity that underlies in the country, political power maintenance is hindering investment and creative development in the public infrastructure sector and its economy.

Shifting the topic to tourism, Mr. Kulesza who had been to North Korea more than 60 times, spoke on how Chinese capital inflow was changing the tourism industry. With the spike of Chinese tourism, tourist-related technology, such as wifi and Union pay, has been widely adopted and the entertainment substance has changed from North Korean focus to a more China-friendly content. Building on the demonstration of North Korea’s transformation, Associate Director Kim presented on the development of Mobile Money in North Korea. With the introduction to 3G, the country has brought the telecom industry to the next level. In addition to a significant increase in cell phone use among the citizens, airtime transfer has risen. While not broadly shared throughout the country, mobile money can be used as a substitute for cash. However, it still has many obstacles to overcome such as raising the penetration rate, improving initial infrastructure and customer service, and, most importantly, raising trust among users that their money will be safely secured.

Underscoring the irony of North Korea: while there are many transformational potentials at a micro-level, no fundamental change is visible at a macro-level, Discussant Mr. Kim asked the speakers to touch on drug problems; ethics, safety, and cost issues; and the possibility of mobile money as wealth holding tool. Another discussant, Director Spadoni, emphasized the necessity of efficiency and capital accumulation in North Korea and raised a question on methods that could generate resources for citizen’s economic development and private investment. Closing the discussion, each speaker addressed the questions. They commonly highlighted that despite the unresolved issues that lie in all industries, the existence of each industry is important to North Korea’s economy.

The Korean War as Lived Experience: New Approaches to the Conflict After 70 Years Summary

On September 10 – 11, 2020, the GW Institute for Korean Studies (GWIKS), the Sigur Center for Asian Studies, and the KDI School of Public Policy and Management co-hosted a virtual international conference in commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the Korean War. During the two-day conference, recognized experts revisited and presented new approaches to the history of the Korean War.

The event started off with congratulatory remarks from Iliana Feldman, the Interim Dean of the GW Elliott School of International Affairs, Jong-Il You, the Dean of the KDI School of Public Policy and Management, and Soo Hyuck Lee, the Ambassador of the Republic of Korea to the US, highlighting the importance of international cooperation. Professor Keun-Sik Jung from the Seoul National University analyzed the conditions for peace by taking a multi-lateral approach, suggesting that East Asia needs a mutually recognizing peace – including the normalization of the intra-Korea relationship and also between the US and North Korea.

Following the introductory session, was ‘The Korean War and Its Impact on Civilians’ session. Moderated by Gregg Brazinsky, Professor of History and International Affairs at GW, three professors from Canada, South Korea, and the US presented their insights into the war, going beyond the military and political aspects, and focusing on the lives of Korean people who had to endure through the war. All three speakers spoke in relation to the structure of power. Assistant Professor Jeongmin Kim from the University of Manitoba, elaborated on the creation of a black market in the exchange of the US Military Payment Certificates and Korean/Japanese sexual labor, while also analyzing the government’s deliberate ignorance on the issue. Professor Janice Kim from York University introduced her research on what the Korean War meant to the regional people. Lastly, Professor Hak Jae Kim from the Seoul National University emphasized the importance of common commemoration effort and the continuation of a peacemaking endeavor under the structure of the international power hierarchy.

On the second day, Professor William Stueck from the University of Georgia moderated the ‘New Approaches to Studying the Roles of Foreign Powers and POW’s’ session. Professor Avram Agov from Langara College shared his research on the impact of the Korean War on socialist countries and socialist countries’ humanitarian aid to North Korea. David Chang from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology focused his presentation on his book ‘The Hijacked War,’ arguing that the Chinese prisoners of war (POWs) hijacked the Korean War.

The conference concluded with a roundtable discussion pondering on the outlook of the peace process in the Korean Peninsula. Panelists pinpointed the significance of overcoming different narratives of the war, the economic gap, and the psychological warfare. They also discussed the role of feminism in the negotiation process, the US and its approach tactics and ideologies in Asian politics, and the danger of falling into binary identities. The discussion ended with many agreeing that it is important to actually have both South Korea and North Korea come together to reach a peace settlement.

Korea Policy Forum on “Security on the Korean Peninsula and the U.S.-ROK Relations” Summary”

On September 3, 2020, the GW Institute for Korean Studies (GWIKS) and the East Asia National Resource Center co-sponsored the Korea Policy Forum on “Security on the Korean Peninsula and the U.S.-ROK Relations”. Moderated by Jisoo M. Kim, Director of the GWIKS, Soo Hyuck Lee, the Korean Ambassador to the United States reviewed the seventy years of U.S.-ROK cooperation and examined what the next seventy years may look like.

Ambassador Lee began by retracing back to 1950 when the US and ROK formed the foundation of an alliance during the Korean War. What started off as a military partnership now has evolved into a comprehensive strategic alliance that goes beyond security, economy, and cultural cooperation. This includes supporting one another with COVID-19 test kits, exchanging public health intellectuals, sharing pop-culture contents, and more. Ambassador Lee also underscored the friendship between the two countries by using a ‘tree’ as a metaphor: military alliance as roots and trunk which provides stability and strength, economic cooperation as branches and leaves that determines the volume and structure, and cultural elements as fruits and flowers which wakes our senses and receives our admiration. Closing his speech Ambassador Lee used a Korean proverb, ‘A tree with deep roots will have many fruits’, to emphasize that our strong bilateral relationship will foster prosperity for both countries in the years to come.

Followed by his speech was a Q&A session in which Ambassador Lee touched on various topics spanning from international political issues to advice on how to become a diplomat. Questions were submitted in advance from students in the US, South Korea, Japan, India, Australia, and Malaysia.

Responding to the first question, Ambassador Lee claimed transparency, openness, and cooperation with civil society, medical workers, and the public as the key elements to South Korea’s early success in fighting the pandemic. He also mentioned that while there is no universal solution to tackling the pandemic, it is crucial to cooperate with the international community.

Many students also brought up questions on the post-pandemic international relations. Ambassador Lee reassured that the security-based alliance between the US and South Korea continues to stay firm. In response to concerns on the current relationship, he argued that confrontations on certain agendas may exist but through negotiations, the two countries will be able to reach an agreement. He also mentioned the significance of China as an economic partner to South Korea. Thus, it is important for South Korea to manage a balance between security and economy with these international partners.

Expanding on international politics, Ambassador Lee elaborated on how the future of North Korea and its nuclear issue remains unpredictable. Despite the uncertainty, for the sake of economic growth, eventually, North Korea is expected to comply with the international community.

Lastly, the webinar ended with Ambassador Lee providing advice for students interested in becoming a diplomat. He underscored the significance of studying humanities by reading many books in history, literature, and philosophy in order to build intellectual power and develop communication skills.

 

[May 8th, 2019] Lecture co-sponsored by KPN, PISA, and GWIKS: “Audacious Imagination for Peace”

On May 8th, 2019,  Korea Peace Network, Partnerships for International Strategies in Asia, and the GW Institute for Korean Studies co-sponsored a lecture with Mr. Lee Taeho, Chair of Policy Committee of People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy on “Audacious Imagination for Peace – Key to the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia”. Moderated by Professor Linda Yarr, Director of Partnerships for International Strategies in Asia (PISA), and assisted by his translator Jenny Jeong, Mr. Lee began by introducing himself as an NGO activist. The topic of his talk was on how civil society can make peace and how peace can be a solution to issues on the Korean Peninsula. Mr. Lee read the script he prepared along with his presentation. He explained that as South Korea had successfully addressed social challenges in a peaceful and democratic way, as shown from the example of the candlelight revolution that impeached the former president, Park Geun-hye, challenges in inter-Korean relations can be handled peacefully as well. The Panmunjeom Declaration announced as a result of the first inter-Korean Summit not only gave hope for a new era of peace on the Korean Peninsula, but also served as a communication channel for North-South Koreas and U.S. – North Korea. Calling for “a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula through complete denuclearization”, the Panmunjeom Declaration aimed to establish a permanent and stable peace regime on the Korean Peninsula. Furthermore, the Singapore Joint Statement between U.S. and North Korea clarified that new and improved U.S.-North Korea relations and security assurance of the North Korean regime must be established in order  to achieve complete denuclearization. In other words, both U.S. and South Korea took a peaceful and mutually trusting approach to facilitate denuclearization of North Korea. Unlike the previous negotiations among North Korea, South Korea and U.S., the three countries are working together to build trust and mutually corresponding relationship. South Korea and U.S. decided to put of Joint military exercises, one of many obstacles in resolving conflicts with North Korea. North Korea agreed to seize nuclear tests and dismantle the Punggyre-ri Nuclear Test Site.

Despite the efforts of the leaders of North and South Korea and the U.S., there remains much more obstacles in tackling issues with North Korea. The second North Korea- U.S. Summit in Hanoi ended without reaching further agreements on North Korean nuclear weapons, and raised mutual mistrust between the two countries. Mr. Lee argued that in order for the ongoing negotiations to lead to the establishment of relations among two Koreas and other neighboring countries, the following perception and approaches should be faithfully maintained. South Korea and U.S. must recognize that their military superiority is overwhelming and threatening in the eyes of North Korea. Thus, South Korea and U.S. should initiate military and threat reduction plan in order to ease tension. Second, there needs to be an all-corresponding consensus on transitioning Northeast Asia into  a Nuclear Weapon Free Zone through joining the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Third, U.S. and the United Nations should take active steps to life some of their harsh sanctions imposed on North Korea. Such draconian economic sanctions only serve as obstacles in implementing inter-Korean agreements as well as inter-Korean exchanges and cooperation. Fourth, Northeast Asian maritime territorial disputes must be resolved in order to alleviate military tensions and resolve conflicts on the Korean Peninsula. Lastly, we must deviate from the stereotypes and taboos of the confrontational Cold War Era and gear toward a more optimistic and peace-oriented approach. Such approach has been proven to be more effective than the previous antagonistic, distrusting military confrontations. This shift toward peaceful means of conflict resolution has been detected not only on the Korean Peninsula, but in South China Sea as well. Mr. Lee explained that governments and citizens of concerned countries should initiate peaceful measures to make this seemingly “unrealistic” scenario a reality.

[May 6th, 2019] Korea Policy Forum: “North Korea and Myanmar: Divergent Paths”

On May 6th, 2019, GWIKS and the Sigur Center for Asian Studies co-sponsored Korea Policy Forum with Andray Abrahamian, 2018-2019 Koret Fellow at Stanford University, on “North Korea and Myanmar: Divergent Paths.” Moderated by Professor Jisoo M. Kim, Director of the Institute for Korean Studies at GW, Dr. Abrahamian began by sharing with the audience of his experience of working in North Korea. During his work at Choson Exchange, he has lived in Beijing and traveled to North Korea numerous times. When his wife got a job in Myanmar, he began to question “what needs to happen when a country is trying to come in from a period of isolation and reintegrate with the global community.” His research on comparing Myanmar and North Korea has been produced into his recent book, North Korea and Myanmar: Divergent Paths. Why has Myanmar transitioned successfully when North Korea could not?

 

Dr. Abrahamian explained that the reasons he decided to compare these two culturally different countries, with divergent histories, and different experiences of colonialism. Strategically they occupy similar positions for China at the heart of Asian landmass, as northeastern and southwestern buffer states. The people of both countries have suffered a long period of isolation and poverty by the choices made by their governments and external responses to their policies. Also, they are the only countries that almost completely sat out wealth creation project that stretch from Singapore to Japan that lifted hundreds of millions of people from poverty. Some claim that Myanmar is still a basket case with ethnic cleansing and genocide still taking place. Dr. Abrahamian explained that while it is true, the current situation of Myanmar is in no comparison to that of North Korea. He argued that both countries, from their births, have faced existential security threat and only in the process of overcoming that threat, was the state of Myanmar able to turn its focus to the reasons for its isolation and address those sufficiently to reintegrate itself into the international community. North Koreans, however, are still trying to find ways to address that security threat. Both of those threats develop outside of the state emerge from their colonial period.

 

Dr. Abrahamian explained that in North Korea, every single person involved in publishing is heavily surveilled and everything that comes out in the media is subject to strict censorship, whereas, in Myanmar, the press is given more freedom and leniency. Even in controlling its borders, Myanmar’s borders are porous and easily accessible, whereas North Korean borders are among the most fiercely guarded places in the world. Snuggling takes place in both places, but in far less frequency in North Korea than in Myanmar. Finally, North Korea operates under a state ideology – the grand narrative of the Korean people righteously struggling for their independence against the hostile world; something absent in Burma. After comparing the conditions of North Korea and Myanmar, Dr. Abrahamian concluded that North Korea and Myanmar, despite their similar histories, have taken different paths mainly due to their government policies.

Co-sponsored Lecture by the Sejong Society of Washington, D.C. and GW Institute for Korean Studies: Sumona Guha, “East Meets South: South Korea – India Relations”

On April 30, 2019, GWIKS and the Sejong Society of Washington D.C. co-sponsored a lecture series with Sumona Guha, Vice President of Albright Stonebridge Group, on East Meets South: South Korea – India Relations. The moderator Garrett J. R. Redfield, the Programming Director of the Sejong Society and Asia-Pacific Analyst at the Institute for Defense Analyses, began with a brief introduction of South Korea and its significance. While most discussions about the Korean Peninsula revolve around North Korea and its security issues, South Korea presents equal importance in its development because it is the 11th largest economy in the world, despite its small size. In November  2017, President Moon called for the “New Southern Policy,” which focuses on the 3P’s: people, prosperity, and peace. Among the three, President Moon aims to achieve success through mutually reciprocal economic cooperation. India is an essential pillar of this policy because it shares Korea’s core values of democracy and a liberal market economy, and views India as an emerging global growth engine. South Korea seeks to enhance its economic relations with India by upgrading the ROK-India comprehensive economic partnership agreement and supporting India’s flagship initiatives.

Guha began by commenting that India’s foreign policy is changing and listed a few points about India and South Korea relations. India had long attempted to situate itself in Asia through its “Act East Policy” to form linguistic and cultural ties with East Asia. Under Prime Minister Modi, India has taken initiatives to branch out and develop diplomatic relations with other countries, including South Korea. Prime Minister Modi’s global leadership agenda was also a way to attract foreign investment to India and expand India’s involvement in world affairs. Under Modi, India has deepened its ties with ASEAN and reformed its economic plan, modeled after China’s economic growth. Prime Minister Modi and President Moon have visited each South Korea and India and taken initiatives to deepen cooperation and bilateral relations with each other. Balancing China is also another essential agenda for India through strengthening institutions that many countries operate in, rather than direct confrontation. As India grows, Guha expects to see more South Korean commercial companies involved in India. Unlike ASEAN that hold regular meetings, South Korea and India may face challenges in that their cooperation is not regular.

Lecture Series: Chisu T. Ko, “Korean Women, Argentine Documentaries: A Look at La Chica del Sur (2012) and Una Canción Coreana (2014)”

On April 25, 2019, GWIKS and Latin American and Hemispheric Studies co-sponsored a lecture series with Professor Chisu Teresa Ko, Associate Professor of Spanish and Coordinator of the Latin American at Ursinus College, on “Korean Women, Argentine Documentaries: A Look at La Chica del Sur (2012) and Una Canción Coreana (2014)”. Moderated by Professor Jisoo M. Kim, Director of the Institute for Korean Studies at GW, Dr. Ko briefly explained how the Argentinian filmmaker José Luis García produced his 2012 documentary La chica del sur (“The Girl From the South”). In 1989, José Luis García arrived to World Festival of Youth and students in Pyongyang, where he met Lim Su-kyung, a young South Korean student who attended the festival in representation of  the student organization Jeondaehyop. Lim had obtained the nickname Flower of Reunification by calling for reunification of the two Koreas, openly criticizing the South Korean Government, sympathizing with North Korea, and insisting on returning to South Korea through the military demarcation line in the DMZ. Enchanted by Lim’s bold and charismatic gesture of traveling to North Korea despite South Korea’s strict national security laws, García later searched her on the internet, traveled to South Korea and interviewed her in 2011. Dr. Ko then introduced another film Una Canción Coreana (“A Korean Song”), co-directed by two Argentine directors, Gustavo Tarrío and Yael Tujsnaider. An-Ra Chung, unlike Lim Su-kyung, is not a famous political icon, but a typical Korean immigrant in Buenos Aires. The documentary portrays Chung’s busy daily life, complex family and work, and a process of opening a new Korean restaurant. Chung is represented as a member of a Korean community that exist in a segregated bubble with little exchange with what is considered Argentine society.  

Dr. Ko points out how the films depict both Lim and Chung’s voices being silenced by gender power dynamics and changing political discourses. While Lim spoke in front of the international press and tens of thousands of spectators about the issues of inter-Korean relations, she is still expected to maintain the role of typical Korean women, preparing food for her guests and family and not participating in conversations. In the documentary, Lim remain silent and invisible when surrounded by older Korean men, and strangers comment on her appearance. Men would explain things to her, even her own political ideology, despite her status as a political icon, activist and professor. Even García himself seems more infatuated about the idea of fragrant Oriental woman and absorbed in the urge to liberate her from oppressive, patriarchal society, rather than addressing the issue of reunification or gender. The documentary  Una Canción Coreana highlights the contradiction of a superwoman who seems to lack a sense of self. Chung is a successful business woman, a voice teacher, a performer and a mother of two children. The film also display her as someone who lacks individual identity and describes herself in tentative terms. The image of Oriental with with lack of self identity maps out perfectly to her construction of herself in hierarchical relation to others, such as her mother-in-law. The film also displays that her husband Victor Ho making all the decisions for her and speaks for her.However, as the film continues, the audience witnesses Chung taking control of and becoming an agent in of the production of the film. The filmmakers’ portrayal reveals the Argentine imaginary of Korean women silenced in patriarchal society.   

Dr. Ko remarked that there has been a surprising surge of documentary films about the Korean community in Argentina recently. This sudden interest of Korean community follows simultaneous invisibility and hypervisibility of Koreans in the Argentine imaginary. Korean immigration to Argentina began in 1960s and peaked in 1990s. Reportedly more than 40,000 Koreans are settling in Argentina. Until recently, representation of Korean community in popular culture and media had been scarce and often negative. They were invisible because they were considered numerically insignificant, foreign, and highly unsimilarable group. But other times, they were hypervisible for the same reasons. The large influx of Korean immigrants in the 1990s was considered “yellow invasion” and Korean immigrants were accused of not learning Spanish, tax evaders, exploiters, and even slave holders. Stereotypes about Korean immigrants can be seen from the sketch character La Coreana performed in yellowface by comedian Juana Molina. La Coreana is described as supermarket owner who is very sneaky and smart with money, always finding ways to rip off her customers, but unintelligent in everything else and used broken Spanish. While much of explicit anti-Korean portrayal id disappearing from mainstream media, Korean descendants are often discriminated against as ultimate foreigners. After discussing the representation of Koreans in Argentine media, Dr. Ko concluded the lecture by arguing that within the realm of representation of Koreans and Asians at large in Argentina, these films exemplify an important turning point. Within the problematic new model of Argentine multiculturalism based on a system of recognition that maintains the hegemony of the recognizer and essentializes the recognized, the position of Asians in Argentina is especially problematic. While Asians have been highly visible as instruments of multiculturalism, they were considered outsiders, exotic foreigners locked in Argentine ideology of Orientalism .       

Korea Policy Forum: Troy Strangarone, “The Implications of Demographic Decline for South Korean National Security”

On April 4, 2019, GWIKS hosted its very first Korea Policy Forum with Troy Stangarone, Senior Director of Congressional Affairs and Trade at Korea Economic Institute of America (KEI) on “The Implications of Demographic Decline for South Korean National Security”. Moderated by Professor Celeste Arrington, Korea Foundation Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at George Washington University, Mr. Stangarone began his lecture by introducing two theories on demographics and national security: geriatric peace and increase in instability. He explained that, according to the Geriatric Peace theory, as the population ages, economic growth will slow down, with the decline in the population in the workforce and more capital spent on welfare. This is problematic in that the government has less to spend on defence. He also pointed out that not all countries will age at the same rate, leading to weakening of security in countries with lower birth rates, particularly South Korea. According to the Increasing Instability theory, countries with younger population will likely transition to neo-authoritarianism (for example, China or Russia), but will not transition to high-income states (for example South Korea and Taiwan), causing international instability. In countries with multi-ethnicity, some ethnicities will rise while others decline, based on their rate of aging population.

Mr. Stangarone then presented a graph of prospects on South Korean demographic trend. The graph displayed three possible trends in South Korean population from 2015 to 2040. As he pointed out that in 2018, South Korea’s total fertility rate had reached below 1 at 0.98, predicted that the potential trend in South Korean population will be somewhere between medium and low trends predicted by the UN. He revealed concern that if South Korea’s population trend moves closer to the low variant, by 2040, 16.5 million people leaving the workforce, decreasing South Korea’s labor pool by half. When added with South Korea’s relatively long life expectancy, there will be less people in the workforce to support the aged population, while more aged population will be in need of support. This is critical in that it will decline economic growth and increase health care costs. He then mentioned that South Korea has the highest level of aged poverty in OECD at 45.7%, along with high rate of old age suicide. South Korea’s declining birth rate can result in social and economic problems in more ways than one.

As far as security, such trend will lead to less capital to spend on national defense and decline in the young population to serve in the military. With South Korea currently confronting North Korea, the size of South Korean military is particularly crucial. Mr. Strangarone then listed some of the Moon administration’s initiatives to resolve the issue: downsizing the military, reducing mandatory service time, shifting reliance from manpower to artificial intelligence, replacing some jobs formerly held by the military with civilians, and budget increase of 7.5% for five years. As he continued to list some of other potential options, he clarified that these suggested solutions are not silver bullets to resolve the problem. The potential options he mentioned includes: tax, healthcare, and pension reforms, labor market reform and raising the retirement age, increased female economic participation, defence reforms, artificial intelligence, and immigration. Among these options, he found that defence reforms to be the most promising. By eliminating the requirement of eight years in reserves, semi-professionalizing the reserves and providing greater income source for the core group of dedicated professionals, the efficiency of the military will increase.

Lecture Series, “Paintings, Songs, and Board Games: Travels to Kŭmgangsan in Late Chosŏn Korea (1600-1900)” with Maya Stiller

On March 7th, 2019, GWIKS hosted a lecture series with Professor Maya Stiller, Assistant Professor of Korean Art and Visual Culture at the University of Kansas, on “Paintings, Songs, and Board Games: Travels to Kŭmgangsan in Late Chosŏn Korea (1600-1900)”. Moderated by Dr. Jisoo M. Kim, the Director of the GW Institute for Korean Studies, Dr. Stiller began by introducing facts about the field of Korean art history. She explained that the field of Korean art history is a relatively new field, compared to Japanese and Chinese art histories. As she introduced some of the overseas scholars who led the study in Korean art history, she noted that most of these scholars focused on painting. Another significant trend in not only Korea but Europe and the United States as well is a study in the 20th century and contemporary Korean art, particularly from the Colonial Era. By looking at a broad range of visual and material objects, Dr. Stiller’s current book project combines the study of visual and material objects with literary source materials and historical records and widens the scope of interdisciplinary research of Korean art history. She argued that Kŭmgangsan was a status pilgrimage site. From the 16th century onward, Late Chosŏn travelers traveled to Kŭmgangsan to garner social and cultural capital by visiting sites that famous scholars had previously visited. Travels to Kŭmgangsan were seen as an indicator of one’s elite status. Paintings, songs, and board games were methods for people who could not physically travel to Kŭmgangsan to virtually travel there and obtain cultural capital. Then Dr. Stiller proceeded to explain travel routes to Kŭmgangsan were so time-consuming and expensive that only a few people were able to afford it.

Dr. Stiller then presented the audience with photographs of Kŭmgangsan and explained the landscape and rock formations in detail. Late Chosŏn period Koreans used various methods -songs, paintings, and board games – to virtually travel to Kŭmgangsan in order to strengthen their social and cultural capital. After presenting examples of each method and interpreting them in detail, she concluded by enlightening the audience of how the perception of Kŭmgangsan changed in the 20th century and what the mountain means to the Korean people.